Abol Taabol

Sunday, October 16, 2005

non sense number 2

It was the thirtieth day of last Feb
That I got entangled in this new web
The clock it struck the twenty five
And all the honey bees left the hive
They flew into anthills to survive
Their story is recorded by dear old Clive
He was sleepy, the result of booze
The shutter of his camera was terribly loose
Still he took aim and clicked the whole day
Till the Queen bee dragged him away.


another interesting link –

amaar duniya

Sunday, October 09, 2005

non sense number one

Every year, the Ig prize is awarded for outstanding work from the Annals of Improbable Research, a quirky journal that spoofs the Nobel Prize. In 2005, the award for chemistry went to Edward Cussler and Brian Gettelfinger of the University of Minnesota for ‘conducting a careful experiment to settle the long standing scientific question: can people swim faster in syrup or in water’. In Physics, the recipient were John Mainstone and the late Thomas Parnell of the University of Queensland, Australia, for conducting an experiment that began in 1927 in which a blob of congealed black tar has been slowly dripping through a funnel at the unbelievable rate of one drop every nine years!!!!
http://www.improbable.com/

Several Indians have been decorated with these awards – Ramesh Balasubramaniam of the University of Ottawa for Physics in 2004 for ‘exploring and explaining the dynamics of hula-hooping’. In 2002, the award in the category of mathematics was shared jointly by two researchers from the Kerala Agricultural University – they were S/Sri K P Sreekumar and G Nirmalan: the subject of their research was ‘estimation of the total surface area of Indian elephants’. Earlier to that, in 2001, there was another pair of joint winners Chittaranjan Andrade and B S Srihari of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences. The category in this instance was Public Health and the topic of research – ‘nose picking is a common activity among adolescents’.

another interesting link –
amaar duniya

Monday, September 26, 2005

Leadership and valuing differences

When I started going to school, we used to live in a small town. There was a garden behind our house. Now that I think of it, I remember it as less of a garden and more of a green patch where in one corner my mother carried on her experiments with growing vegetables and in a shady place below a guava tree, I used to try experiments with garden insects. Once we had caught a few dragonflies and put them in a large bottle. I remember our disappointment when those dragonflies refused to eat the sugar we put in the bottle and eventually died. That was my first lesson in acknowledging “differences” – that dragonflies cannot survive on what my army of red ants (also in a bottle) gleefully lapped up everyday.

Time went by and I left school and went to another small town to live in an engineering college hostel. This was one of the IITs. This was the first time when I was properly exposed to the diversity of the country that is India. Our cooks were from Andhra, my floor-mates were from Bihar, Delhi, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, you name it. One of my best friends was from a region of the country that was much cooler and drier than the humid, hot, dusty town in West Bengal. It took him a few muscle sprains and a couple of heat strokes to come to the realization that this was a different climate and he needed to modify his jogging routine to suit the region. That was when I started to appreciate what “diversity” means.

I am much older now. I have seen much more of the world. Working in a multinational company, one of the best things I have learnt is to identify a good manager and to make a distinction between a manager and a leader. When we are looking for a manager, we look for someone who will make sure that things get done the right way and efficiency is the key to achieving results. We look for the ability to manage people – not to DO. That means we do not necessarily make the best salesman the manager – because there is a great deal of difference between selling and getting others to sell. However, when we are looking for a leader, being a good manager with a good track record and having all the competence and skills is NOT enough. One of the key qualities we look for is the ability to “Value Differences”. In today’s multinational, multicultural world, leaders in every aspect of life are constantly challenged by different cultures, different ethos, different ways of doing things. In many cases, the senior managers / leaders have to work across boundaries or as an expatriate in the globalised world. Not only do they have to deal with a culturally different workforce, they have to also deal with cultural differences of the customers and other stakeholders. Can they adapt themselves? Can they appreciate the difference? Can they see the value in that difference? Do they play to the strengths of people from a different culture? The answers to these questions determine whether a manager / leader is successful or not.

The Indian Cricket Authorities need to apply the same measurement criteria in selecting the right coach for the Indian Cricket team. Otherwise, as we have seen in last two months, cultural insensitivity can create havoc and split the team.